WHAT IF
Conditional and in particular counterfactual reasoning plays an important role in everyday life. It is important to know not only how things are or were, but also how they could have been and how they would be under certain circumstances. Counterfactual thinking plays a similar role in inquiries in the natural sciences and humanities. Yet one might be concerned about the scientific standing of counterfactual reasoning. Both a satisfactory (historical) epistemology and a detailed linguistic analysis of the conditional claims used to convey counterfactual thinking are still wanting, as is a description of the role of counterfactuals in more complex narrative and rhetorical structures such as thought experiments.
Counterfactual reasoning and thought experiments take a wide variety of forms in different disciplines. Our group brings together history of philosophy, linguistics, literary studies, philosophy and psychology to examine counterfactuals and/or thought experiments in these domains and from these various perspectives. Our work focuses on three topics:
Current Projects
Subproject P1 | Philosophy | Conditionals and Information Transfer |
---|---|---|
Subproject P2 | Linguistics | From Sentence to Discourse |
Subproject P3 | Philosophy | Imagination and Counterfactual Knowledge |
Subproject P5 | Philosophy | Simulation and Counterfactual Reasoning in Neuroscience |
Subproject P6 | Literary Studies | Modelling Counterfactual History in Russia |
Subproject P7 | Philosophy | Alternatives for the Future |
Subproject P8 | Linguistics | Conditionals and Discourse |
Subproject MF1 | Psychology | On the Acquisition of Counterfactual Reasoning |
Subproject MF2 | History/Philosophy | Instituting and Contesting Scientific Openness |